Methodological Approaches to Studying Stylistic Features of Architectural Ensembles in Russian Recreational Complexes

Abstract

Modern art studies tend to question well-established notions concerning architectural styles, highlighting the need to analyse stylistic features of architectural complexes and develop novel methodological t

ools to provide a deeper understanding of their stylistic diversity. This article proposes a new approach to investigating stylistic characteristics of Russian recreational architectural ensembles, considering their historical, cultural, and regional contexts. The offered methodology integrates key theories elaborated by leading scholars in art history and theory of architecture, including A. V. Ikonnikov, V. B. Koshaev, and G. E. Rusanov. As a case study, the article discusses characteristic features of the Central Sanatorium of the Workers’ and Peasants’ Red Army named after K. E. Voroshilov (1930–1934). Considering style as a semantic structure fulfilling formative and informational roles, the authors tend to assess architectural ensembles of recreational complexes as stable and systematic. The central concept of the study is ensemble, defined as a universal architectural complex that stands apart from generic buildings and expresses a distinct identity. The article highlights that issues of architectural ensemble integrity promote the discussion about identifying stylistic trends and their synthesis to a dialectical level. Consequently, the authors bring to the limelight the interaction between all components comprising an architectural ensemble, as well as bring out the necessity to interpret architectonic structures within the dynamics of urban environment.

References

1. Amelyants A. A. Development of concepts about ensemble in urban planning theory. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Moscow, 2004, 22 p. (In Russ.)

2. Amelyants A. A., Kulikov A. S. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya «Ansambl’» v Evrope [Evolution of the concept “Ensemble” in Europe]. Vestnik TGTU, 2002, no. 4, pp. 655–657. (In Russ.)

3. Arkhitektura i gradostroitel’stvo: entsiklopediya [Architecture and urban planning: encyclopedia]. Ed. by A. V. Ikonnikov. Moscow, Stroyizdat, 2001, 688 p. (In Russ.)

4. Baburov A. V. Prostranstvo v arkhitekturnom ansamble [Space in architectural ensemble]. Arkhitekturnyy ansambl’ kak forma realizatsii sinteza [Architectural ensemble as a form of synthesis realization]. Sb. nauch. trudov pod red. I. A. Azizyan, L. I. Kirillovoy. Moscow, VNIITAG, 1990, pp. 12–35. (In Russ.)

5. Bass V. G. Formal’no-stilisticheskie aspekty v sisteme professional’nykh tsennostey peterburgskogo arkhitekturnogo tsekha neoklassicheskoy epokhi: na primere proektov rekonstuktsii Nikolaevskogo vokzala [Formal-stylistic aspects in the system of professional values of the St. Petersburg architectural workshop of the Neoclassical era: on the example of reconstruction projects of Nikolaevsky railway station]. Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta kultury, 2007, vol. 176, pp. 92–103. (In Russ.)

6. Vlasov V. G. Arkhitektura. Slovar’ terminov [Architecture. Dictionary of terms]. Moscow, Drofa, 2003, 191 p. (In Russ.)

7. Vlasov V. G. Stili v iskusstve: slovar’ [Styles in art: dictionary]. Saint-Petersburg, 1995. T. 1, 672 p. (In Russ.)

8. Ikonnikov A. V. Khudozhestvennyy yazyk arkhitektury [Artistic language of architecture]. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 1985, 175 p. (In Russ.)

9. Ilyin L. A. Ansambl’ v arkhitekture goroda [Ensemble in city architecture]. Arkhitektura SSSR, 1935, no. 5, pp. 41–50. (In Russ.)

10. Karpovich V. S. O sokhranenii khudozhestvennogo oblika gorodov [On preservation of the artistic appearance of cities]. Trudy IV s”ezda russkikh zodchikh, sostoyavshegosya v Sankt-Peterburge s 5 po 12 yanvarya 1911 g. Saint-Petersburg, Gosudarstvennaya tipografiya, 1911, pp. 108–117. (In Russ.)

11. Kondrashina S. V., Shipicyna O. A. Terminologicheskij kontekst izucheniya fenomena «Ansambl» v tekstax arxitekturnoj periodicheskoj pechati [The terminological context of the study of the phenomenon of “Ensemble” in the texts of architectural periodicals] Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kulturologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy` teorii i praktiki, no. 12(86): in 5 vol. Vol. 3. Tambov: Gramota, 2017, pp. 91–94.

12. Koshaev V. B. Ansambl’ kak obraznaya sistema i tselostnost’ v iskusstve [Ensemble as an imagery system and integrity in art]. Dekorativnoe iskusstvo i predmetno-prostranstvennaya sreda. Vestnik MKhPU, 2015, no. 4, pp. 4–13. (In Russ.)

13. Lavrov V. A. Voprosy arkhitekturno-planirovchnogo ansamblya [Questions of architectural-planning ensemble]. Arkhitektura SSSR, 1935, no. 5, pp. 51–56. (In Russ.)

14. Lisakovskiy I. N. Khudozhestvennaya kul’tura: terminy, ponyatiya, znacheniya [Artistic culture: terms, concepts, meanings]. Moscow, Izd-vo RAGS, 2002, 238 p. (In Russ.)

15. Merzhanov M. I. Sanatoriy-gigant [Sanatorium-giant]. Arkhitektura SSSR, 1934, no. 8, pp. 28–31. (In Russ.)

16. Mirimanov V. B. Imperativ stilya [Imperative of style]. Moscow, Rossiyskiy gos. gumanit. un-t, 2004, 195 p. (In Russ.)

17. Nashchokina M. V. Antichnoye nasledie v russkoy arkhitekture nikolaevskogo vremeni [Ancient heritage in Russian architecture of Nikolaev period]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya, 2011, 616 p. (In Russ.)

18. Nashchokina M. V. Problema ansamblya v russkoy arkhitekturnoy mysli XIX-XX vekov. Vzglyad iz segodnyashnego dnya [The problem of the ensemble in Russian architectural thought of the 19th-20th centuries. View from today]. Academia. Arkhitektura i stroitel’stvo, 2023, no. 3, pp. 39–45. (In Russ.)

19. Nekhvyadovich L. I. Etnicheskaya traditsiya kak stileobrazuyushchaya kategoriya [Ethnic tradition as a style-forming category]. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya, 2011, no. 5(30), pp. 343–345. (In Russ.)

20. Rusanov G. E. Structure of architectural ensembles in historically formed city. On the example of Saint Petersburg. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Sankt-Peterburg, 2004, 45 p. (In Russ.)

21. Tokarev A. G. Sanatoriy im. K. E. Voroshilova v Sochi — osobennosti formal’noy sistemy i prostranstvennoy organizatsii [Sanatorium named after K. E. Voroshilov in Sochi — features of the formal system and spatial organization]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel’nogo universiteta, 2017, no. 1(60), pp. 33–39. (In Russ.)

22. Khan-Magomedov S. O. Arkhitektura sovetskogo avangarda. Kniga pervaya. Problemy formoobrazovaniya. Mastera i techeniya [Architecture of Soviet avant-garde. Book one. Problems of form creation. Masters and movements]. Moscow, Stroyizdat, 1996, 712 p. (In Russ.)

23. Khan-Magomedov S. O. Khrushchevskiy utilitarizm: plyusy i minusy [Khrushchev’s utilitarianism: pros and cons]. Available at: https://niitiag.ru/pub/pub_cat/han_magomedov_hrushhevskij_utilitarizm_pljusy_i_minusy.html. (In Russ.)

24. Khramova M. Yu. Architectural ensemble as a basis for qualitative characteristics of the city’s cultural landscape. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2012, 22 p. (In Russ.)

25. Shipitsyna O. A. Ansambl’ (Tezaurus arkhitekturnogo mentaliteta XXI veka) [Ensemble (Thesaurus of architectural mentality of the 21st century)]. Arkhitektura i stroitel’stvo Rossii, 2016, no. 3(219), pp. 106–108. (In Russ.)

26. Entsiklopedicheskiy leksikon: V 17-ti tomakh [Encyclopedic lexicon: In 17 volumes]. V. 2. Sankt-Peterburg, tipografiya A. Plyushara, 1835–1841. (In Russ.)

27. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ F. A. Brokgauza i I. A. Efrona [Encyclopedic dictionary of F. A. Brockhaus and I. A. Efron]. Internet-portal «Slovari i entsiklopedii na Akademike». Available at: https://dic.academic.ru/contents.nsf/brokgauz_efron/. (In Russ.)