ISSN 2411-0795
ISSN 2411-0795
En Ru
Surrealism in Painting: An Experience of Structural Analysis

Surrealism in Painting: An Experience of Structural Analysis

Recieved: 11/17/2025

Accepted: 12/27/2025

Published: 02/10/2026

Keywords: painting, non-classical art, dadaism, surrealism, pictoral activity, motor skills, levels of motor construction, hierarchy, inversion, unconscious, symbols.

To cite this article

Sevostyanov D.A. Surrealism in Painting: An Experience of Structural Analysis. // Theory and History of Art. 2026. N 1, p.124–140 https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2411-0795-2026-1-09.

N 1, 2026

Abstract

The article examines the structure of pictures considered as surrealist painting. More specifically, it outlines and prioritizes distinctive features of surrealist paintings. Despite there is a large number of literary sources on surrealism, this topic still remains underdeveloped. To analyse surreal images, a system of motor construction levels developed by the famous psychophysiologist N. A. Bernstein is used. The painting is viewed as a collection of the artist's motor actions. This system consists of a series of levels, each of which includes movements of equal complexity. Taken together, these levels form a hierarchy. Within this hierarchy systemic inversions may develop, in which the lower, subordinate level takes on a dominant role. The combination of these levels is characteristic of every artistic movement, including surrealism. The lower motor levels are almost completely absent in surreal images. The level that ensures the similarity between the depicted and the depicted object is very strong. The next level, which provides operations with topological classes of objects and schematization of their images, gets a specific expression, when the image is subjected to deliberate and purposeful distortion. However, the vector of these distortions is determined by the next motor level. This level is the highest in the hierarchy and performs operations with symbols. The symbolic level of activity manifests itself in a specific way in surrealist paintings. The author demonstrates that this level does not reproduce, but rather simulates dreams and other products of the unconscious, and each image takes on a specific symbolic meaning. Some of these symbols, created by the artist, are concluded to be potentially considered as part of the cultural heritage.

References

  1. Andreev L.G. Syurrealizm [Surrealism]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1972. 232 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Bakhtin M. M. Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaya kul'tura srednevekov'ya i Renessansa [The Work of François Rabelais and the Folk Culture of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1990. 545 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Bernshtein N. A. Fiziologiya dvizhenii i aktivnost' [The Physiology of Movements and Activity]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1990. 494 p. (In Russ.)
  4. Debord G. Obshchestvo spektaklya [The Society of the Spectacle]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2000. 184 p. (In Russ.)
  5. Dex P. Povsednevnaya zhizn' syurrealistov, 1917–1932 [The Everyday Life of the Surrealists, 1917–1932]. Moscow, Molodaya gvardiya, Palimpsest Publ., 2010. 318 p. (In Russ.)
  6. Jones M. V. Dostoevskii posle Bakhtina. Issledovanie fantasticheskogo realizma Dostoevskogo [Dostoyevsky after Bakhtin. A Study of Dostoyevsky's Fantastic Realism]. St. Petersburg, Akademicheskii proekt Publ., 1998. 256 p. (In Russ.)
  7. Korenkova N. E., Oleinik Yu. N. Psikhomotorika v strukture integral'noi individual'nosti cheloveka [Psychomotor Skills in the Structure of a Person's Integral Individuality]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2006, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 54–66. (In Russ.)
  8. Kulikova M. E. Vystavka shesti khudozhnikov (Vladivostok, 1988) [The Exhibition of Six Artists (Vladivostok, 1988)]. Gumanitarnye issledovaniya v Vostochnoi Sibiri i na Dal'nem Vostoke, 2011, No. 1, pp. 5–7. (In Russ.)
  9. Malinina N. L. Realisticheskii khudozhestvennyi obraz v zhivopisi: proshloe i nastoyashchee [The Realistic Artistic Image in Painting: Past and Present]. Aktual'nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk, 2010, No. 9, pp. 175–181. (In Russ.)
  10. Pinkovskii V. I. Syurrealizm i freidizm: paralleli i raskhozhdeniya [Surrealism and Freudianism: Parallels and Divergences]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, 2008, No. 1, pp. 167–171. (In Russ.)
  11. Sevost'yanov D. A. Chelovek risuyushchii. Otobrazhenie ierarkhicheskikh i inversivnykh otnoshenii v graficheskoi deyatel'nosti [The Drawing Man. Representation of Hierarchical and Inverse Relations in Graphic Activity]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2018. 208 p. (In Russ.)
  12. Sevtinova A. V. Obraz duraka v kalmytskoi bytovoi skazke [The Image of the Fool in the Kalmyk Everyday Tale]. Problemy nauki, 2017, No. 6 (19), pp. 77–79. (In Russ.)
  13. Shokhoeva A. I. Tekhnologii komp'yuternoi grafiki i vizualizatsii dannykh [Computer Graphics and Data Visualization Technologies]. Colloquium-journal, 2022, No. 31 (154), pp. 55–57. (In Russ.)
  14. Yakovleva E. L. Detskie travmy kak istok tvorchestva Sal'vadora Dali [Childhood Traumas as the Source of Salvador Dali's Creativity]. Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika, 2022, No. 1, pp. 80–93. (In Russ.)
  15. Breton A., Goll I. Manifeste du surréalisme [Manifesto of Surrealism]. Available at: Surréalisme 1 October 1924 — Princeton Blue Mountain collection (accessed: 16.11.2025).
  16. Hobbs R. Surrealism and Abstract Expressionism: From Pyschic to Plastic Automatism. Dervaux I. Surrealism USA. New York, National Academy Museum in conjuction with Hatje Cantz Publishers, 2005, pp. 56–65.
  17. Lagana L. Dadaism, Surrealism, and the Unconscious. Symposia Melitensia, 2013, No. 9, pp. 145–156.