Keywords:
M.V. Lomonosov, history of Moscow State University, history of art, art of classicism, art of neoclassicism, art of historicism, professor N.N. Kovalenskaya, sculptor I.P. Martos, Russian sculpture, continuity of styles, biographies of scientists of Moscow State University
Available in the on-line version with: 30.03.2025
To cite this article
Savelyev Yu.R.
The First Monument to M.V. Lomonosov in Arkhangelsk and the Study of the Work of I.P. Martos at Moscow University. // Theory and History of Art.
2025.
N 1,
p.10–33
https://doi.org/10.24412/2411-0795-2025-1-10-33.
In the development of Russian art, the period of classicism (mid 18th — mid 19th century) preceded the era of Historicism of the 19th – early 20th century, and the period of neoclassicism (the first half of the 20th century) completed its history. The main source of the development of the historicism style was Russian history, and during the periods of its origin and completion, the images of M.V. Lomonosov were captured in bronze by outstanding sculptors I.P. Martos in 1826–1829. (in Arkhangelsk) and N.V. Tomsky in 1953 (in front of the Moscow University building on Vorobyovy Gory).
In the period of Neoclassicism or the «new Russian classicism» of the 1930s and 1950s, Moscow University became one of the main centers for the study of the art of the first Russian classicism. Professor N.N. Kovalenskaya (1892‒1969), the best expert on the history of this style, creates the most complete monograph to date on the life of I.P. Martos, the author of the first sculptural monument to M.V. Lomonosov in Russia. She considered the work of this sculptor to be the pinnacle of the development of Russian monumental sculpture. Moscow State University archive introduces Professor N.N. Kovalenskaya's personal materials into scientific use for the first time.
The development of the art of classicism and neoclassicism, the study of the history of both these periods was closely connected with the history of Lomonosov Moscow State University, as well as with the study of the work of sculptor I.P. Martos, the author of the first sculptural monument to the founder of the university.
Glazov I.V. Rol` klassiki v formirovanii obraznogo stroya otechestvennoj zhivopisi: nasledie i novatorstvo // Teoriya i istoriya iskusstva. Nauchny'j zhurnal. Vy'p. 3/4 / gl. red. A.P. Lobodanov. Moscow: BOS, 2019. S. 81–108.
Kovalenskaya N.N. Istoriya russkogo iskusstva XVIII veka [The history of Russian art of the XVIII century]. Moscow; Leningrad: Ikusstvo, 1940. 258 р.
Kovalenskaya N.N. Martos. Moscow; Leningrad: Ikusstvo, 1938. 140 р.
Kovalenskaya N.N. Skulptura pervoy treti XIX veka // Istoriya russkogo iskusstva pervoy polovini XIX veka [Sculpture of the first third of the XIX century // The history of Russian art in the first half of the XIX century]. Moscow: Ikusstvo, 1951. P. 69–84.
Kovalenskaya N.N., Alekseeva T.V., Petrov V.N. I.P. Martos // Istoriya russkogo iskusstva. T. VIII. Kniga pervaya. Rsskaya skulptira pervoy treti XIX veka. Glava vtoraya. Skulptura. [The History of Russian Art. Vol. VIII. The first book. Russian sculpture of the first third of the XIX century. Chapter two. Sculpture]. Moscow: AN SSSR Publishing, 1963. P. 287–316.
Kovalenskaya Natalia Nikolaevna. Arkhiv MGU (Otdel kadrov) [MSU Archive (Human Resources Department)]. F. 1. Оp. 34. D. 4017. 1943–1956. P. 22.
Natalia Nikolaevna Kovalenskaya. Iz istorii klassicheskogo iskusstva. [From the history of classical art]. Мoscow: Sovetskiy khudozhnik, 1988. 284 р.
Lisovskiy V.G. I.A. Fomin. Leningrad, 1979.
Rozanova T.M., Tvorchestvo K.M. Bikovskogo I klassitsisticheskiye tendentsii v arkhitekture Moskvi posledney treti XIX veka [The work of K.M. Bykovsky and classicist trends in the architecture of Moscow in the last third of the XIX century]. Avtoreferat dissertatsii rfndidata iskusstvovedeniya. Moscow, 2004.
Soultanov N.V. Vistavka arkhitekturnikh proyektov v Akademii khudozhestv [Exhibition of architectural projects at the Academy of Arts] // Zodchiy. 1878. No. 1. P. 8–9.
Soultanov N.V. Teoriya arkhitekturnikh form [Theory of architectural forms]. Saint-Petersburg, 1901.