ISSN 2411-0795
ISSN 2411-0795
En Ru
Production Art as a Middle Theory: Art, Production and Politic in the 1920s

Production Art as a Middle Theory: Art, Production and Politic in the 1920s

Keywords: Productivism, VKhUTEMAS, Total Art, Avant-garde, Production, teleological view of history, art and institution

To cite this article

Evsevev M.Y., Pu Anyuan Production Art as a Middle Theory: Art, Production and Politic in the 1920s. // Theory and History of Art. 2024. N 1/2, p.209–226

N 1/2, 2024

Abstract

This article focuses on Productivism — a key point in the process of collision and convergence of different artistic styles in 1920s Russia — and examines how artistic styles participated in the formation of socialist artistic styles at different levels. Productivism dissolved the barrier between art and the system focuses on and allowed for avant-garde and Bolshevik visions of the future society as a whole, at the level of reality.

Within the theoretical framework of Total art, production became the highest common denominator, embodying the shared vision and modernizing imagination of a country or even an entire society with regard to the future. This approach allows us to observe the profound interplay of various forces and factors, while maintaining a sufficient distance and vigilance towards a developmental and teleological view of history.

The research conducted in this article shows that from a social perspective, the overall landscape of socialist art formation is not monopolized by politics, and that various heterogeneous elements meet and combine within a broader socialist culture.

References

  1. Barooshian V.D. (1976). Vkhutemas and Constructivism. The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review, 3(1), pp 197–207.
  2. Pu Anyuan. (2020). A Hundred Years of VKHUTEMAS: A Fragmented Picture of Early Modernism. Art& Design Research, 6, 68–72. doi: CNKI:SUN:SHIZ.0.2020-06-011 (In Chinese) 浦安原. 呼捷玛斯一百年: 早期现代主义图景残缺的一角. 艺术设计研究. 2020(06). 68–72.
  3. Pu Anyuan & Zhang, Lei. (2021). The Paradox of VKHUTEMAS: The National Identity and Reconstruction of Function of Constructivism. Art& Design Research, 4, 70–78. doi: CNKI:SUN:SHIZ.0.2021-04-010 (In Chinese). 浦安原, 张磊. 呼捷玛斯悖论: 构成主义的国家身份和功能再造. 艺术设计研究. 2021(04). 70–78. (In Chinese).
  4. Roberts J. (2009). Productivism and its Contradictions. Third Text, 23(5), 527–536.
  5. Mazaev A.I. (1975) Koncepcija proizvodstvennogo iskusstva 20-h godov.
  6. He Y. (2019). Boris Groys and the total art of Stalinism. Thesis Eleven, 152(1), 38–51.
  7. Merton R.K. (1967). On Theoretical Sociology. Five Essays, Old and New. New York: Free Press.
  8. Khan-Magomedov S.O. (1995, 2000). VKhUTEMAS: Higher State Art and Technical Workshops, 1920–1930: Architecture. Wood. Metal. Ceramics. Graphics. Painting. Sculpture. Textile: In 2 books. Moscow.
  9. Encyclopedia of Russian avant-garde. Encyclopaedia of the Russian avant-garde. [Online encyclopaedia]. URL: https://rusavangard.ru (date of application: 10.09.2022).
  10. Arvatov B. (1925) Genesis and the culture of things: to the statement of the question // Almanac of Proletkult: Culture and Genesis. Organisation of everyday life. Art and production. Criticism and bibliography. Proletkult in the Field. Moscow: All-Russian Proletkult, 1925. pp. 75–82.
  11. Kiaer C. (1997). Boris Arvatov's Socialist Objects. October, 81, 105–118.
  12. Arvatov B. (1926). Art and the organization of everyday life. Print and Revolution, 4, 83–89.
  13. Gantseva N.N., Lavrentiev A.N., Musina R.R., Ziva V.F. (2022) Geometric cut and social factors in the design of functional clothing 1920s as an early stage of the practice of constructivism (to the 100th anniversary of the concept of "industrial costume"). Decorative art and object-spatial environment. Bulletin of S. G. Stroganov Russian State University of Arts and Crafts. 3–2, 17–33.
  14. Institute of Artistic Culture (1923). Russian Art, 2–3, 85–88.
  15. Zalambani M. (2003). Art in Production. Avant-garde and Revolution in Soviet Russia in the 20s / Per. from Italian. N. B. Kardanova. Moscow.
  16. Arvatov B. (1930). About agit-i prose-art. Moscow.
  17. Arvatov B. (1926). Art and Production: a collection of articles. Moscow.
  18. Novitsky P. (1929) A new type of art-technical institute on the nature of VKHUTEIN. Vkhutein: Higher State Art-Technical Institute in Moscow. Moscow.
  19. Lobodanov A.P. Otnoshenie xudozhnika k «zhivopisny'm yavleniyam» i vospriyatiyu im xudozhestvennogo tvorchestva // Teoriya i istoriya iskusstva: Vy'puski 3/4. M.: Izdatel'stvo «BOS», 2023. C. 8–17.
  20. Groys B. (2018). In the flow. Verso Books.