ISSN 2411-0795
ISSN 2411-0795
En Ru
Artistry of Traditional Cultural Objects: An Ethnographic Approach

Artistry of Traditional Cultural Objects: An Ethnographic Approach

Recieved: 01/27/2026

Accepted: 03/18/2026

Published: 05/11/2026

Keywords: artistry, ethnography, ethnology, artifact, thing, ethnic group, folk culture, archaism, decorative and applied arts, artistic image, semantic image

To cite this article

Dmitriev, V.A., Kalashnikova, N.M. Artistry of Traditional Cultural Objects: An Ethnographic Approach. // Theory and History of Art. 2026. N 2, p.57–74 https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2411-0795-2026-2-04.

N 2, 2026

Abstract

This article proposes an approach to identifying the artistic quality of traditional cultural artifacts, characteristic of ethnographic museology. Artistry is considered an additional characteristic of a folk culture object. The presence of artistry is determined by the task of conveying ethnographic information through symbolism incorporated into the design of the object, and by the desire, characteristic of the archaic world, to integrate the object into the expanded context of ritual and symbolic interactions. Ethnology’s attention to the entire spectrum of ethnic art reflects the main theme of this discipline: identifying the role of the archaic in various categories and states of culture. As a result, the primary goal of studying and processing the complex of artistic features in folk culture objects is the transformation of the artistic image into a semantic image. Deciphering the meanings of a semantic image allows for a deeper understanding of folk culture. The article concludes with examples of descriptions of artistic ethnographic artifacts, representing reconstructions of semantic images of the object environment of ethnic groups.

References

  1. Koshaev V., Missonova I. Antropologiya iskusstva (vvedeniye v temu) [Anthropology of art (introduction to the topic)]. Kunstkamera [Kunstkamera], 2024, no. 1, pp. 110–118. (In Russ.)
  2. Bayburin A. K. Semioticheskiy status veshchey i mifologiya [Semiotic status of things and mythology]. Material`naya kul`tura i mifologiya. Sbornik MAE`. Leningrad, 1981, vol. XXXVII, pp. 215–226. (In Russ.)
  3. Gadamer G. Aktual’nost’ prekrasnogo [The Relevance of the Beautiful]. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 1991, 367 p. (In Russ.)
  4. Kostina O., Filimonova O. Neyasnost’ iskusstva: ontologicheskoye izmereniye [The ambiguity of art: the ontological dimension]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedeniye [Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Cultural Studies and Art Criticism], 2023, no. 50, pp. 92–105. (In Russ.)
  5. Kuznetsova N. Aspekty, sostavlyayushchiye spetsifiku khudozhestvennogo teksta [Aspects that constitute the specificity of a literary text]. Vestnik Permskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarno-pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya 3. Gumanitarnyye i obshchestvennyye nauki. Razdel 1. [Bulletin of Perm State Humanitarian and Pedagogical University. Series 3. Humanities and social sciences. Section 1], 2022, no. 2, pp. 82–87. (In Russ.)
  6. Kanap’yanova R., Gulyayev P. Dekorativno-prikladnoye iskusstvo kak sintez narodnoy kul’tury i tvorchestva [Decorative and applied art as a synthesis of folk culture and creativity]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury [Bulletin of the Moscow State University of Culture], 2016, no. 2 (70), pp. 68–74. (In Russ.)
  7. Ushakov N. K voprosu ob arkhivatsii i publikatsii polevogo etnograficheskogo istochnika [On the issue of archiving and publishing a field ethnographic source]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Vyp. 4 [Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Series 2. Issue 4], 2015, pp. 113–124. (In Russ.)
  8. Bayburin A., Levington G. O sootnoshenii fol’klornykh i etnograficheskikh faktov [On the relationship between folklore and ethnographic facts]. Hungaricae, 1983, vol. 32(1–4), pp. 3–31. (In Russ.)
  9. Fedorov P. Arkhaicheskoye myshleniye vchera, segodnya, zavtra [Archaic thinking yesterday, today, tomorrow]. Moscow, URSS, 2009, 176 p. (In Russ.)
  10. Freydenberg O Mif i literatura drevnosti [Myth and Literature of Antiquity]. Moscow, Nauka, 1978, 605 p. (In Russ.)
  11. Kalinina I. K voprosu o soderzhanii ponyatiy «semanticheskiy obraz» i «khudozhestvennyy obraz» [On the content of the concepts of “semantic image” and “artistic image”]. Teoriya i metodologiya arkhaiki: Obraz i arkhetip v traditsii arkhaiki: ritual’no-mifologicheskiy kontekst i semantika [“Theory and methodology of archaism”: Image and archetype in the archaic tradition: ritual and mythological context and semantics”]. St. Petersburg, Kunstkamera, 1998, pp. 43–49. (In Russ.)
  12. Neklyudov S. Osobennosti izobrazitel’noy sistemy v doliteraturnom povestvovatel’nom iskusstve [Features of the visual system in pre-literary narrative art]. Ranniye formy iskusstva. [Early forms of art]. Moscow, Nauka, 1972, pp. 191–220. (In Russ.)
  13. Levin A. Mif, Tekhnologiya. Nauka [Myth. Technology. Science]. Priroda [Nature], 1977, no. 3, pp. 88–101. (In Russ.)
  14. Kharitonovich D. Srednevekovyy master i yego predstavleniye o veshchi [The medieval master and his idea of a thing]. Khudozhestvennyy yazyk srednevekov’ya [Artistic language of the Middle Ages]. Moscow, 1982, pp. 24–39. (In Russ.)
  15. Yeats F. Iskusstvo pamyati [The Art of Memory]. St. Petersburg, 1997, 480 p. (In Russ.)
  16. Kalinina I. Funktsional’no-tekhnologicheskiy podkhod [Functional-technological approach]. Teoriya i metodologiya arkhaiki [Theory and methodology of archaism]. St. Petersburg, 1998, pp. 21–27. (In Russ.)
  17. Kravchunas B., Nikolaenko N. Izobrazitel’naya deyatel’nost’ i mozg [Visual activity and the brain]. Teoriya i metodologiya arkhaiki [Theory and methodology of archaism]. St. Petersburg, 1998, pp. 47–55. (In Russ.)
  18. Konovalov A., Timofeeva E. Ponâtie «étnografičeskij predmet» [The concept of “ethnographic subject]. Problemy komplektovaniâ, naučnogo opisaniâ i atribucii étnografičeskih pamâtnikov [Problems of staffing, scientific description and attribution of ethnographic monuments]. Leningrad, GME narodov SSSR [GMÉ of Peoples of SSSR], 1987, pp. 16–22. (In Russ.)
  19. Kaminskaya N., Erdman E. Sotsial’no-kul’turnyye tekhnologii kak faktor sokhraneniya traditsionnogo iskusstva v kul’tury i iskusstv [Socio-cultural technologies as a factor in preserving traditional art in culture and arts], 2016, vol. 1(26), pp. 80–87. (In Russ.)
  20. Kalinina I. K voprosu o soderzhanii ponyatiy «semanticheskiy obraz» i «khudozhestvennyy obraz» [On the content of the concepts of “semantic image” and “artistic image”]. Obraz i arkhetip v traditsii arkhaiki: ritual’no-mifologicheskiy kontekst i semantika: Teoriya i metodologiya arkhaiki [Image and archetype in the archaic tradition: ritual and mythological context and semantics: Theory and methodology of archaism]. St. Petersburg, Kunstkamera [Kunstkamera], 2016, pp. 43–49. (In Russ.)
  21. Ornamentika predmetov narodnoy kul’tury [Ornamentation of folk culture objects]. St. Petersburg, Slaviya, 2022, 240 p. (In Russ.)