ISSN 2411-0795
ISSN 2411-0795
En Ru
Problems of Studying “Eccentric Stone”: Experience Working with Collections in the South of the Far East

Problems of Studying “Eccentric Stone”: Experience Working with Collections in the South of the Far East

Recieved: 02/05/2026

Accepted: 03/18/2026

Published: 05/20/2026

Keywords: retouched sculpture, paleoglyptics, zoomorphic images, ancient art, Sea of Japan basin, Neolithic

To cite this article

Pankina A.I. Problems of Studying “Eccentric Stone”: Experience Working with Collections in the South of the Far East. // Theory and History of Art. 2026. N 2, p.151–171 https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2411-0795-2026-2-09.

N 2, 2026

Abstract

This study examines a collection of stone retouched sculptures from the archaeological cultures of the Sea of Japan basin from the Final Paleolithic (17 000 BP) to the Late Neolithic (2 500 BP). Special attention is paid to the problems of distinguishing this type of artifacts into the category of primitive art, related both to the specifics of the material itself and the existing stereotypes in scientific practice. The methodological principles that make it possible to work with the controversial category of art are considered in detail, including theoretical developments of practical iconics (D.A. Sevostyanov), theories of the history of things (G.Kubler) and primitive syncretism (V.R.Kabo). For the most objective assessment of the “figured stones” and the subsequent interpretation of the products, an up-to-date list of criteria has been developed within the framework of this study, and tested on the materials of the stone sculpture collection of the Sea of Japan basin. The analysis of the reviewed collection, which includes more than 64 items, allowed us to identify three groups of artifacts, according to the number of parameters corresponding to the criteria: sculptures, conventional images, and unlikely candidates.

References

  1. Derevyanko A., Krivoshapkin A., Larichev V., Petrin V. Paleolit vostochnyh predgorij Arc-Bogdo (Yuzhnaya Gobi) [Paleolithic of the eastern foothills of Arts-Bogdo (Southern Gobi)]. Novosibirsk, Izd-vo IAET SO RAN, 2001, 152 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Pismo v redakciyu [Letter to the editor]. Sovetskaya arheologiya, 1981, no. 4, pp. 289–305. (In Russ.)
  3. Lebedincev A. «Figurnye predmety» so stoyanok kamennogo veka severo-vostoka Sibiri: kriticheskij razbor [Figured objects from Stone Age sites in Northeastern Siberia: a critical analysis]. Stratum Plus. Arheologiya i kulturnaya antropologiya, 2018, no. 1, pp. 155–161. (In Russ.)
  4. Sevostyanov D. Prakticheskaya ikonika (Nauka ob izobrazheniyah, sdelannyh rukoj cheloveka) [Practical Iconics (The science of images made by human hand)]. Novosibirsk, 1995, 184 p. (In Russ.)
  5. Stolyar A. Proishozhdenie izobrazitelnogo iskusstva [The origin of fine art]. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 1985, 300 p. (In Russ.)
  6. Marquet J., Lorblancher M. A Neanderthal face? The proto-figurine from La Roche-Cotard, Langeais (Indre-et-Loire, France). Antiquity, 2003, vol. 77, no. 298, pp. 661–670.
  7. Lbova L., Tabarev A. Homo Simbolicus (ocherki o proishozhdenii i rannih etapah razvitiya kultury, iskusstva, ritualov) [Homo Simbolicus (essays on the origin and early stages of culture, art, and rituals)]. Saint-Petersburg.: Politeh-Press, 2024. 234 p. (In Russ.)
  8. Lbova L., Volkov P. Drevnejshee iskusstvo Sibiri (tehnologii, formy, simvoly) [The most ancient art of Siberia (technologies, forms, symbols)]. Saint-Petersburg, Politeh-press, 2021, 149 p. (In Russ.)
  9. Tradicionnoe mirovozzrenie tyurkov Yuzhnoj Sibiri. Prostranstvo i vremya. Veshnyj mir [The traditional worldview of the Turks of Southern Siberia. Space and time. The material world]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1988, 225 p. (In Russ.)
  10. Kocheshkov N. Dekorativnoe iskusstvo narodov Nizhnego Amura i Sahalina XIX–XX vv.. (Problemy etnicheskih tradicij) [Decorative art of the peoples of Nizhny Amur and Sakhalin in the 19th–20th centuries. (Problems of ethnic traditions)]. Saint-Petersburg, Nauka, 1995, 152 p. (In Russ.)
  11. Fetisov A., Shavelev A. Vikingi. Mezhdu Skandinaviej i Rusyu [Vikings. Between Scandinavia and Russia]. Moscow, Veche, 2013, 336 p. (In Russ.)
  12. Kubler Dzh. Forma vremeni. Zametki ob istorii veshej [The form of time. Notes on the history of things]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press, 2023, 176 p. (In Russ.)
  13. Pankina A. Paleogliptika pribrezhnyh territorij severo-zapadnoj chasti Tihogo okeana: istoriya izucheniya i kriterii vydeleniya [Paleoglyptics of the coastal territories of the Northwestern Pacific Ocean: the history of the study and criteria of allocation]. Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Geoarheologiya. Etnologiya. Antropologiya, 2024, vol, 48, pp. 25–45. (In Russ.)
  14. Dyakov V. Ritualno-obryadovye izobrazheniya v arheologicheskih ansamblyah Primorya [Ritual and ceremonial images in archaeological ensembles of Primorye]. Rerihovskie chteniya. 1984 god k 100-letiyu N. K. Reriha i 80-letiyu S. N. Reriha: materialy konf. Novosibirsk, 1985, pp. 262–267. (In Russ.)
  15. Shevkomud I. Ihtiomorfnye retushirovannye izobrazheniya osipovskoj kultury nachalnogo neolita Priamurya [Ichthyomorphic retouched images of the Osipov culture of the Early Neolithic Amur region]. Dalnevostochno-sibirskie drevnosti: sbornik nauchnyh trudov, posvyashennyj 70-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya V. E. Medvedeva. Novosibirsk, Izd-vo IAET SO RAN, 2012, pp. 116–121. (In Russ.)
  16. Grishenko V. Kashkalebagshskaya kultura finalnogo neolita ostrova Sahalin (k voprosu o sosushestvovanii tradicij epoh kamnya i paleometalla v I tys. do n. e. v ostrovnom mire Dalnego Vostoka) [Kashkalebagshi culture of the Final Neolithic of Sakhalin Island (on the question of the coexistence of traditions of the Stone and paleometallic eras in the 1st millennium BC in the island world of the Far East)]. Uchenye zapiski Sahalinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2015, no. 11–12, pp. 117–131. (In Russ.)
  17. Pervye rybolovy v zalive Petra Velikogo. Priroda i drevnij chelovek v buhte Bojsmana [The first fishermen in Peter the Great Bay. Nature and ancient man in Boisman Bay]. Vladivostok, Dalnevost. otdelenie AN RAN, 1998, 390 p. (In Russ.)
  18. Tabarev A. Po sledu halcedonovogo tigra. Arheologicheskij etyud [On the trail of the chalcedony tiger. An archaeological study]. Drevnee iskusstvo tihookeanskih kultur. Vladivostok, Izd-vo Dalnevost. un-ta, 1996, pp. 51–72. (In Russ.)
  19. Gladyshev S. Verhnepaleoliticheskie kompleksy bassejna r. Zerkalnoj (Yugo-Vostochnoe Primore) [Upper Paleolithic complexes of the Zerkalnaya River basin (Southeastern Primorye)]. Novosibirsk, 1989, 16 p. (In Russ.)
  20. Lapshina Z. Arheologiya Nizhnego Amura: issledovaniya predmetov melkoj plastiki kamennogo veka [Archeology of the Lower Amur: studies of small-scale plastic objects of the Stone Age]. VyatGU: Vestnik gumanitarnogo obrazovaniya, 2021, no. 4(24), pp. 80–87. (In Russ.)