A Medium-Centered Analysis of Alexey Belyaev-Gintovt's Practice

Abstract

This article offers a medium-centered analysis of the practice of contemporary Russian artist Alexey Belyaev-Gintovt. It demonstrates that the graphic production mode serves as a mechanism for reducing form to a condensed emblem that operates "before the plot": it does not convince with arguments, but rather reinforces recognition and normalizes the proposed order. Drawing on Vilém Flusser's concept of the apparatus, the study interprets the graphic medium as a technical and compositional device that translates cultural quotations into stable mythologemes. The "comic grammar" of a number of works is separately described: the autonomy of the sheet as a panel with a completed replica and the assembly of meanings through the juxtaposition of sheets; repetition and variability are considered as a means of standardizing and serializing visual language. The methodology combines visual-iconographic analysis of serial works with a medium-based analysis of technological procedures and contextualization in discussions of metamodernism and post-Soviet conservative visuality. The scientific novelty lies in shifting the focus from the thematic description of images to an analysis of their action and modes of reproducibility; the practical significance lies in refining the tools for describing graphic apparatus, useful for visual research and curatorial practice.

References

1. Aleksei Gintovt: Imperiya — vysshaya forma politicheskogo tvorchestva [Empire Is the Highest Form of Political Creativity]. Russkaya mechta. Available at: https://rusmechta.ru/news/aleksej-gintovt-imperiya-vysshaya-forma-politicheskogo-tvorchestva/ (accessed 20.09.2025). (In Russ.)
2. Andreeva E. Yu. Postsovetskoe iskusstvo 1990-kh — nachala 2000-kh mezhdu istoriei i nostal'giei [Post-Soviet Art of the 1990s — Early 2000s Between History and Nostalgia]. International Journal of Cultural Research, 2019, no. 3 (36), pp. 114–123. (In Russ.)
3. Voennyi dandyzm i evraziiskii imper-art [Military Dandyism and Eurasian Empire-Art]. Geopolitika.ru. Available at: http://www.geopolitica.ru/Articles/1040/ (Wayback archived 29.01.2013; accessed 04.10.2025). (In Russ.)
4. Gavrilov D. M. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kultury i iskusstv [Bulletin of the Moscow State University of Culture and Arts], 2022, no. 6 (110), pp. 15–23. (In Russ.)
5. Flusser V. Za filosofiyu fotografii [Towards a Philosophy of Photography]. St Petersburg: Saint Petersburg University Press, 2008. 146 pp. (In Russ.)
6. Shvets A. Kak sovershat' dejstviya pri pomoshhi mediuma: material'ny'j kontekst poe'ticheskogo vy'skazy'vaniya v knige V. Mayakovskogo i E'. Lisiczkogo «Dlya golosa» [How to Perform Actions with the Help of a Medium: the Material Context of a Poetic Statement in the Book by V. Mayakovsky and E. Lissitzky "For the Voice"]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. Available at: https://www.nlobooks.ru/magazines/novoe_literaturnoe_obozrenie/156_nlo_2_2019/article/20895/ (accessed 14.10.2025). (In Russ.)
7. Engström M. Metamodernizm i postsovetskii konservativnyi avangard: "Novaia akademiia" Timura Novikova [Metamodernism and the Post-Soviet Conservative Avant-garde: Timur Novikov's "New Academy"]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie (New Literary Observer), 2018, no. 151, pp. 1–31. (In Russ.)
8. Engström M. Resaikling pozdnesovetskoi kontrkul'tury i novaia estetika "vtorogo mira" [Recycling of Late-Soviet Counterculture and the New Aesthetics of the "Second World"]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie (New Literary Observer), 2021, no. 169 (3), pp. 70–88. (In Russ.)
9. Arantes P. Post-History, Technical Images and Freedom in Times of Barbarism // Flusser Studies. 2014. № 18, pp. 1–8.
10. Engström M.; Jonson L.; Erofeev A. In: Russia — Art Resistance and the Conservative-Authoritarian Zeitgeist. London; New York: Routledge, 2017, pp. 84–102.
11. Pratt H. J. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 2009, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 107–117.